Kerala's Fiscal Health Report – Part III: Solving Yesterday's Problem

In Parts I and II, we argued that Kerala's fiscal stress cannot be understood solely through debt statistics.

The State's liabilities emerged within a fiscal architecture in which developmental responsibilities are decentralized while key monetary, taxation, and borrowing powers remain centralized.

There is another important point often overlooked in public discussions.

It is impossible to run a growing company without debt.

Expansion requires investment. Investment requires financing. Financing often involves borrowing.

No serious business leader asks whether a company should have debt. The relevant question is whether the benefits generated by growth exceed the cost of servicing that debt.

The same principle applies to States.

Debt incurred to support productive expansion is fundamentally different from debt incurred merely to survive. The issue is not debt itself, but the relationship between debt, growth, and future productive capacity.

We also argued that debt is not the fundamental issue.

Productive capacity is.

Yet there remains a practical reality.

The liabilities exist.

The interest burden exists.

The fiscal pressures exist.

Before discussing future development, Kerala must address the accumulated burden of the past.

The question is how.

Fortunately, the answer does not require new institutions, constitutional amendments, or radical policy innovations.

An appropriate instrument already exists.

The Existing Precedent

The Union Government's Scheme for Special Assistance to States for Capital Investment (SASCI) provides States with 50-year interest-free loans for capital investment projects.

This is an important precedent.

It demonstrates that long-duration, interest-free financial support for States is already accepted within India's existing fiscal framework.

The principle has already been established.

The only question is whether that principle should be applied more broadly.

A Balance-Sheet Problem Requires a Balance-Sheet Solution

Kerala's accumulated liabilities did not emerge overnight.

Nor did they emerge in isolation.

They accumulated over decades within the fiscal framework discussed in Part I.

The appropriate response is therefore not austerity.

Nor is it endless refinancing at conventional interest rates.

The appropriate response is balance-sheet repair.

States should be provided access to the existing SASCI framework for restructuring eligible legacy liabilities through 50-year interest-free loans.

This is not a subsidy.

It is not a concession.

It is not a bailout.

It is a financial restructuring mechanism.

Corporate finance professionals understand this principle well.

When liabilities accumulated under one set of circumstances begin constraining future growth, maturities are extended, servicing burdens are reduced, and balance sheets are stabilized.

The objective is not to erase obligations.

The objective is to create room for future expansion.

States deserve the same logic.

Why This Matters

Every rupee spent servicing legacy liabilities is a rupee unavailable for:

  • infrastructure,
  • industrial development,
  • employment generation,
  • technological modernization,
  • education,
  • healthcare,
  • and future productive investment.

The objective is not merely healthier accounts.

The objective is greater developmental capacity.

A 50-year interest-free restructuring mechanism would immediately reduce fiscal pressure while preserving existing institutional arrangements.

Most importantly, it would allow States to focus on the future rather than continually managing the burdens of the past. By reducing immediate servicing pressures, it would provide the breathing space necessary for productive investment, economic expansion, and employment growth—strengthening the economy's capacity to service its obligations over time.

But balance-sheet repair alone does not create prosperity.

Solving yesterday's problem is necessary.

It is not sufficient.

The larger challenge remains:

How does Kerala create employment, expand productive capacity, strengthen local production systems, and generate rising incomes for future generations?

That is the question we turn to next.

Next: Kerala's Fiscal Health Report – Part IVA: Solving Tomorrow's Problem



Rajendra Rasu
The author writes on monetary systems and political economy